2025:UHC:13 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc Application No. 1076 of 2024 02nd January, 2025 Vijay Bharti …….Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …….Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Basant Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. By means of this C528 application, applicant has challenged the entire proceedings of the Criminal Complaint No.994 of 2023 titled as “Rajendra Prasad Kohli Vs. Vijay Bharti”, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as “Act of 1881”), registered at Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar as well as quashing of cognizance & summoning order dated 18.12.2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that as the complainant & the present applicant were friends, the complainant loaned ₹12,00,000/- to the applicant out of which ₹6,00,000/- & ₹3,00,000/- have already been paid to the complainant & endorsement to that effect has also been taken by Rajendra Prasad Kohli (complainant). He also submitted that applicant is ready to pay the balance. 3. It is further contended by learned counsel for the applicant that Mr. R.P. Kohli lodged a complaint in C.M. Helpline with fictitious facts, knowledge of which was acquired by the applicant by means of R.T.I. He also submits that Section 138 of Act of 1881 proceedings cannot be initiated for a legally enforceable debt, therefore, the proceedings are liable to be quashed. 2025:UHC:13 2 4. Having heard learned counsel for the applicant & having gone through entire record, it transpires that a cheque of amount ₹7,00,000 bearing no.702108 was given by the applicant which was returned with a note of “fund insufficient” and thereafter after following the due process of law proceedings under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 were initiated by learned Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, this not being a fit case to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. 2023, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. Accordingly, C528 application stands dismissed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.01.2025 SK