218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SAJAN SINGH ANURAG RASTOGI AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- VIKRAM AGGARWAL 12.08.2025 therein to take a final decision on the letter dated period of two 2. said order. 3. Haryana has furnished a copy of the speaking order dated passed in compliance with the directions issued vide order dated 12.08.2025 aforesaid. The s copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. that he does not press the contempt petition as no grievance subsists IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5435- Date of Decision: SAJAN SINGH Versus ANURAG RASTOGI AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Mr. Akshit Pathani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG, Haryana. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) CWP-23355-2025 was disposed of vide order dated (Annexure P-1) with a direction to respondent No.2 therein to take a final decision on the letter dated two months. The instant contempt petition alleges At the outset, learned counsel representing the State of Haryana has furnished a copy of the speaking order dated passed in compliance with the directions issued vide order dated .2025 aforesaid. The same is taken on record as Mark copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the contempt petition as no grievance subsists IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.11.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents VIKRAM AGGARWAL 2025 was disposed of vide order dated ) with a direction to respondent No.2 therein to take a final decision on the letter dated 16.07.2025 within a The instant contempt petition alleges disobedience of the At the outset, learned counsel representing the State of Haryana has furnished a copy of the speaking order dated 26.11.2025 passed in compliance with the directions issued vide order dated is taken on record as Mark-X and a copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the contempt petition as no grievance subsists HIMANSHU 2025.11.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-5435-2025 -2- and the petitioner, if so advised, shall avail all such remedies as shall be admissible in law against the said order. 5. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is disposed of as not having been pressed. Rule stands discharged. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 27.11.2025 himanshu Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.11.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document