Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010123472017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1288/2017 BIPUL CHANDRA NATH S/O LT. JADAV CHANDRA NATH VILL and P.O. MOHANPUR, P.S. ALGAPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -6. 2:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI -6 ASSAM 3:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASTC GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM 4:THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT ASTC SILCHAR DIVISION SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 5:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A and E ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWHAATI -29 ASSAM 6:THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER OFFICER OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A and E ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S ROY, MR.M H LASKAR,MR. S ALAM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, TRANSPORT DEPT., ASSAM,MS. D BORAH,SC, ASTC,MR.C BARUAH,SC, AG BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 17.03.2025 Heard Shri M.H. Laskhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri R. Boro, learned Standing Counsel, AG and Ms. M.D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Transport Department. From the order sheets, it reflects that when the matter had come up for consideration on 17.12.2021, this Court was informed that the petitioner had passed away in the meantime and time was granted to file substitution petition. The matter was listed thereafter on 09.09.2024 when further 2 (two) weeks time was granted to take necessary steps regarding substitution. The matter has been listed thereafter today which is after more than 6 (six) months and no steps have yet Page No.# 3/3 been taken. Shri Laskar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of his best efforts, there is no instructions forthcoming for filing substitution application. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this case. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant