Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13875 (CHH)

SMT. SHAKUNTALA CHOUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1984/2021 · 2025-06-22

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1984 of 2021 1 - Smt. Shakuntala Choubey Wd/o Late Shri Dinesh Kumar Choubey Aged About 64 Years R/o Village- Bajrangpur, Nawagaon, Ward No.1, Tahsil- Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Supriya Choubey D/o Late Shri Dinesh Choubey Aged About 22 Years R/o Village- Bajrangpur, Nawagaon, Ward No.1, Tahsil- Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer(R) Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil- Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Patwari Village- Farhad, P.C. No.29, Tahsil- Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Gram Panchayat Farhad Through Secretary, Village- Farhad, Tahsil- Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 7 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Farhad, Village- Farhad, Tahsil- Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23.06.2025 REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- 1. Mr.Kela, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners pleads no instruction. 2. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Kela, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to revive their prayer, if cause of action still subsists. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha