MUMTAJ ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/5066/2025 · 2025-05-09
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27195 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5066 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mumtaj Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Chandra Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties No. 1 and 3. Notice for opposite party No.3 has been accepted by Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made an innocuous request that he is not pressing the prayer No.1 of the writ petition but for redressal of the grievance, the opposite party No.3 may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, which is already pending and liberty may also be given to prefer a fresh representation.
3. Therefore, without entering into the merit of the issue and considering that the prayer No.1 is not pressed, liberty is given to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, District Sitapur ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.
4. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench