Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138718 (MAD)

R.Perumal v. The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP(MD)/8811/2024 · 2025-04-16

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.OP(MD) NO.8811 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.8811 of 2024 R.Perumal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jeeyapuram, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 4.P.Perumayee 5.Banu @ Banumathi ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to give adequate police protection to the petitioner’s life and limb and his family members, based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 07.06.2024. _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.8811 of 2024 For petitioner : Mr.R.Thangapandian For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R4 & R5 : No appearance ***** O R D E R This petition is filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to give adequate police protection to the petitioner’s life and limb and his family members based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 07.06.2024. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the private respondents/ respondents 4 and 5, due to which the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.60 of 2014 before the learned District Munsif, Thuraiyur and the same was disposed of in accordance with the compromise memo filed by the parties. Now, the respondents 4 and 5 is causing disturbances. Therefore, the petitioner sent a representation for police protection dated 07.06.2024 to the respondents 1 to 3, but the same has not been considered. Hence, he filed this petition. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.8811 of 2024 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner is pending with the third respondent, which is under enquiry and they will conduct the enquiry and dispose of the same within 15 days. 4. Since the representation of the petitioner is under consideration by the third respondent, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period 15 days from the date of this order, after affording opportunity to both the parties in accordance with law. 5. With the abovesaid observations and directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.8811 of 2024 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jeeyapuram, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.8811 of 2024 P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.8811 of 2024 16.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis