IN TH 121 Barnjit Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HO Present: Mr Mr *** AMAN CHAUD 1. The pursuant to th 17.07.2001 agai 26.12.2003 for merit-1 in categ candidate was to 12.02.2004. 2. Lea appointment lett elapsed, he was Conduct was en Singh and anot on 25.11.2024, process pursua appointment on N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CWP-135 Date of de Versus unjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Mr. Baljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Pun *** HAUDHARY, J. (Oral) The petitioner had applied for ap to the advertisement dated 23.06. 1 against the 52 posts advertised. The 3 for completing backlog and he ha category of Partially Blind, however was to come present for joining in th Learned counsel while referring to ent letter was received on 28.02.2004 e was allowed extension to join till 2 was enforced. Reliance is placed upon d another vs. State of Punjab and ot 2024, which was filed at the hands of ursuant to the Advertisement of ent on the same date i.e. 26.12.2003 an NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH 1358-2025 (O&M) te of decision: 20.01.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY vocate for the petitioner. G, Punjab. for appointment to the post of Cler 23.06.2001, last date of which wa d. The appointment letter was issued o he having Roll No.3053 and secure wever, as per the condition No.16, in the concerned Institute/School up ing to the speaking order, states that .2004 but since joining time had alread till 28.05.2004 as the election code o d upon the judgment in the case Inde and others, CWP-10463-2013, decide nds of candidates in the same selectio t of 2001 and issued the letter o 003 and joined on 01.01.2004. Further f Clerk ch was sued on secured the upto that the already code of Inder decided election etter of urther, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.21 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1358-2025 (O&M) -2- relies on the judgment of the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in Inspector Rajendra Singh and others vs. UOI and others, WP(C) No.2810 of 2016, decided on 23.07.2017 and Division Bench of this Court in Parveen Kumar and Others vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP-10315-2002 decided on 18.08.2003. 3. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel sought instructions and thus states that the respondents would not be averse to having a relook at the matter and decide afresh within a period of 3 months, taking note of the aforesaid submission and judgments, which satisfies learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reason, whereupon the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 20.01.2025 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.21 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document