Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1387 (AP)

B MAHABOOB BASHA v. S. SURESH KUMAR, IAS

CC/2817/2025 · 2026-04-16

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010524772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2817/2025 Between: 1. B MAHABOOB BASHA, S/O. NOOR AHMED, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O.D.NO.25/35A, JINDABAI MAJEED, VTC KURNOOL, KURNOOL (PO), KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI A SIRI I A S, COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, (MA AND UD) KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. SRI P VISWANADHAM, THE COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SRI P V SESHA SAYEE, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 18220 /2024 dated 17.07.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. P VENGALA REDDY 3. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.18220 of 2024, dated 17.07.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 17.04.2026 PNS