LAL GOVIND MANJHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THR THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPT.
WPC/3537/2025 · 2025-08-12
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13868 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13868 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:23414 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3537 of 2025 ------
1. Lal Govind Manjhi, S/o Late Abulchandra Manjhi, R/o Village Ramaldih, P.O. Koeridih, P.S. Jasidih, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
2. Bipin Bihari Lal, S/o Late Shyam Bihari Lal, R/o Bina Sadan, Parmeshwar Dayal Road, Barmasia, P.O. & P.S. Barmasia, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
3. Kamdeo Prasad Ray, S/o Late Shyamla Prasad, R/o Village Singhjori, P.O. Punasi, P.S. Jasidih, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
4. Ramanand Singh, S/o Late Kailash Singh, R/o Village Palojori, P.O. & P.S. Palojori, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
5. Usha Jha, Widow of Late Prafulla Chandra Jha.
6. Pramila Devi, Widow of Late Maheshwar Prasad Yadav.
7. Usha Devi, Widow of Late Ramchandra Mandal
8. Nafisa Khatoon, Widow of Md. Murshid. … … Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.
2. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
4. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
5. The Accountant General (A & E), Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Respondents ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Advocate ------
04/ 12.08.2025
Heard learned counsel representing the petitioners and
learned counsel representing the respondents.
2.
It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners or their deceased husbands / fathers are entitled to get the notional benefit of Grade-I Pay, from the date of appointment.
3.
Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the issue has already been set at rest by several judgments of this
2025:JHHC:23414 2
Court and ultimately it has been held that the clause which prohibited the retired and deceased employees to get the said benefits, has been struck down. He submits that the effect of striking down the said clause is that all the employees be they superannuated or deceased, are entitled to get the notional benefit of Grade-I Pay. He submits that the respondents are now extending the benefits to only those persons who are approaching this Court. He further submits that the petitioners have filed representations before the Authority concerned, but no decision has yet been taken.
4.
Learned counsel representing the respondent-State submits that if the petitioners file fresh individual representation annexing the judgments of the High Court, their case will be considered.
5.
Considering the aforesaid submission, I direct the petitioners to file their detailed representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, annexing all the documents which they rely upon including the judgments passed by this Court and also the orders by which similarly situated persons have been extended the benefits by the respondents.
6.
The representation must be filed within a period of four weeks. If such representations are filed, the concerned respondents will consider the case of the petitioners within six weeks thereafter.
7.
If any adverse order is passed against the claim / representation of the petitioners, the reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioners.
8.
The entire process must be concluded within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with the
2025:JHHC:23414 3
representations of the petitioners.
9.
Before parting, I direct the Director, Primary Education, School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, to look into this issue and if the decision of this Court in W.P.(S) No.2589 of 2020 (Sudhir Narayan Dwary & Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other Analogues cases, is in rem, he should ensure that all the similarly situated persons will get the same benefits without they being forced to approach this Court.
10. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands
disposed of.
11. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Director, Primary Education, School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Prashant.Cp-2