SIYA RAM AND OTHERS v. NAIB TAHILDAR, BARAUNSA, TAHSIL JAISINGHPUR, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS
A227/2653/2025 · 2025-05-06
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26150 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2653 of 2025 Petitioner :- Siya Ram And Others Respondent :- Naib Tahildar, Baraunsa, Tahsil Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the opposite party No.1 i.e. Naib Tahsildar Baraunsa, Tahsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur to expeditiously decide the recall application dated 31.7.2018 for recalling the order dated 14.7.2018 passed by Naib Tahsildar Baraunsa, Tahsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur in Case No. 1893 of 2018 computerized No. T-201804680701893 (Suryakant and another Versus Indra Kumar & another) under section 34 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, pending before him, in accordance with law, within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." Taking note of the fact that recall application in mutation case is pending since July 2018 and also that the case related to mutation of name(s) in revenue records should be decided expeditiously, being summary in nature, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent No.-1 to consider and decide the pending recall application dated 31.07.2018, in Case No. 1893 of 2018 Computerized No. T-201804680701893 (Suryakant and another Versus Indra Kumar & another), after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within two months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is also expected from the authority concerned to conclude the proceedings expeditiously say within a period of three months, as per law, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench