Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40457 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3945 of 2025 Applicant :- Pratima Singh @ Dimpal Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Gulam Rabbani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Gulam Rabbani, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anant Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in jail since 25.1.2025 in Case Crime No. 28 of 2025 u/s 103(1), 238(1), 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023, P.S. Kotwali Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar. It has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case as she has not committed any offence as alleged. 3. Attention has been drawn towards the impugned F.I.R. wherein the date of incident has been indicated as 22.1.2025 but the F.I.R. has been lodged on 24.1.2025. The complainant of the F.I.R. is the present applicant herself inasmuch as she lodged F.I.R. of missing of her husband to whom she traced out but she could not find his location. During the course of investigation the culpability of the present applicant has been found to the effect that he was having illicit relation with one Akash Yadav and such co-accused Akash Yadav killed her husband with the help and assistance of the present applicant. Therefore, the present applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of section 61(2) BNS (erstwhile 120B IPC). There is no eye witness account or last seen evidence. The present applicant was happily living with her husband so she may not be instrumental to provide help to main accused Akash Yadav to kill her husband. The applicant has no criminal history of any kind whatsoever. Charge-sheet has been filed in this case. Being a lady the applicant may be given the benefit of section 480 B.N.S.S. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has given an undertaking on behalf of applicant that the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with the trial proceedings and shall abide by all terms and conditions of bail, if granted. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. Without entering into the merits of the case and considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties, contents and allegations of the F.I.R., the fact that the date of incident has been indicated as 22.1.2025 but the F.I.R. has been lodged on 24.1.2025, complainant of the F.I.R. is the present applicant herself inasmuch as she lodged F.I.R. of missing of her husband, the present applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of section 61(2) BNS (erstwhile 120B IPC), there is no eye witness account or last seen evidence, applicant was happily living with her husband so she may not be instrumental to provide help to main accused Akash Yadav to kill her husband, applicant has no criminal history of any kind whatsoever, charge-sheet has been filed in this case, being a lady the applicant may be given the benefit of section 480 B.N.S.S. and the undertaking given on behalf of the applicant that she shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Pratima Singh @ Dimpal Singh, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he / she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him / her under Section 269 of the B.N.S., 2023. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 84 of B.N.S.S., 2023 may be issued and if the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him / her in accordance with law, under Section 208 of the B.N.S., 2023. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S., 2023. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him / her in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall not leave the country (India) without prior permission of the Court. . (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench