COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SHRI NARMADESHWAR INTER COLLEGE THRU. MANAGER SHIV KARAN SINGH v. STATE OF THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/4966/2025 · 2025-05-06
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138643 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138643 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26254 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4966 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Shri Narmadeshwar Inter College Thru. Manager Shiv Karan Singh Respondent :- State Of Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Ms. Shivangi Singh, holding brief of Sri Ajay Pratap Singh-II, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vivek Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State- opposite parties no.1 to 7.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:-
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties specially the Opposite Party No. 2 and 4 to take decision on the application dated 18.11.2024 (Contained as Annexure no. 3 to the Writ Petition) preferred by the Petitioner by seeking permission to fill up one post of Assistant Clerk in the institution in terms of the Regulation 101 Chapter III framed under the UP Intermediate Education Act, 1921 expeditiously as early as possible within period of 15 days, in the interest of justice. (i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties specially the Opposite Party No. 2 and 4 to provide the permission to the Petitioner institution to fill up the post of Assistant Clerk in the institution by following the provisions of the Regulation 101 Chapter III framed under the UP Intermediate Education Act, 1921."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.2 and this Court may direct opposite party no.2 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.2 i.e. Director of Education (Secondary), U.P., Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 6.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench