Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13864 (PNJ)

PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/1439/2025 · 2025-04-24

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Pawan Kumar State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Karanvir Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, directing the respondent to correct the office mistake whereby the petitioner’s candidature was considered on the basis of HTET 2013 was required to be considered on the basis of HTET 2011. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case no.2 is directed to decide his pending Annexure P-14, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. the respondents 03.10.2024 will be IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1439 Date of Decision :24.04.2025 Versus of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Karanvir Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana. DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed, inter alia, directing the respondent to correct the office mistake whereby the petitioner’s candidature was considered on the basis of HTET 2013 red to be considered on the basis of HTET 2011. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case no.2 is directed to decide his pending representation , in a specified period. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana the respondents-State and submits that the pending will be decided by the second respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 1439-2025 Date of Decision :24.04.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Karanvir Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana. inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to correct the office mistake whereby the petitioner’s candidature was considered on the basis of HTET 2013 certificate, though it red to be considered on the basis of HTET 2011. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent representation, dated 03.10.2024, Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of and submits that the pending representation, dated respondent/Secretary of the mandamus directing the respondent to correct the office mistake whereby the petitioner’s though it that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondent , , accepts notice on behalf of , dated PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.04.24 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1439-2025 Commission, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law months. 5. In view of the has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of April 24, 2025 ps 2025 -2- by passing a speaking order in accordance with law In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of `50,000 to the petitioner. April 24, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within three statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No within three statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.04.24 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document