Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138639 (ALL)

NAZIMA BEGUM v. NEDESHAK BAL VIKAS AND 3 ORS

WRIA/6839/2005 · 2025-05-12

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27629 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6839 of 2005 Petitioner :- Nazima Begum Respondent :- Nedeshak Bal Vikas And 3 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Karunakar Srivastva Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Case is called out in the revised list. 2. None is present for the petitioner(s) when this case is taken up for hearing while learned Standing Counsel for the State is available. No request for adjournment has either been made on behalf of the petitioner(s). 3. From perusal of the record, it appears that since this matter pertains to the year 2005, petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing his case. Even otherwise, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench