AVNEESH SINGH PAL @ DHANGAR AND 2 OTHERS v. State of U.P. THRU PRINCIPAL SEC. HOME AND ANOTHER
A482/3825/2025 · 2025-05-06
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138636 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138636 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26520
Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3825 of 2025 Applicant :- Avneesh Singh Pal @ Dhangar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Sec. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard Shri Praveen Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now 528 of B.N.S.S.) by the applicants with the following prayer:-
" That For the fact, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying in the petition, duly supported with an affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon' ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Non- Bailable Warrant dated 7.02.2025 & 24.04.2025 in under section 419,420,467,469 of IPC & 66-C of I.T. Act, Police Station- Hazratganj District- Lucknow passed in Criminal Case No. 27092/2021 in Case crime No. 387/2020,, State versus Kuldeep Sharma @ Kuldeep Hindu & Others, which are pending before the learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, District- Lucknow, as contained as ANNEXTURE NO.1 to this petition. "
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 . 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their
prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6.
Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench