Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138621 (ALL)

JAY NARAYAN v. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) KADIPUR SULTANPUR AND 4 OTHERS

A227/2643/2025 · 2025-05-06

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26342 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2643 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jay Narayan Respondent :- Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kadipur Sultanpur And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh,Ajay Pratap Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kadipur, Sultanpur to decide the application for Temporary Injunction filed Under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. filed along-with Civil Suit No. 260/2022 {Jay Narayan Versus Radheyshyam and others) expeditiously as early as possible within seven days, in the interest of justice. It is also prayed that during the pendency of the application Under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. filed along-with Civil Suit No. 260/2022 {Jay Narayan Versus Radheyshyam and others), the private respondents may be directed not to raise any construction over the land in dispute, in the interest of justice." 3. Considering the prayer limited to the issue of mandamus, the writ petition is disposed off directing the court concerned to decide the Temporary Injunction Application filed Under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. in Civil Suit No. 260/2022 expeditiously within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench