ADITYA CHAUDHARY ALIAS RAJA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
C482/2047/2018 · 2025-06-16
Ashish Naithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13861 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13861 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.2047 of 2018 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. D.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Devendra Singh, learned AGA for the State.
3. On the previous occasion (02.06.2025), learned counsel for the applicant sought time for reconstruction of the file as he had stated that the file had been misplaced.
4. Today, learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement that he has no instructions from his client and file could also not be reconstructed.
5. In view aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the Applicant, the C482 application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
16.06.2025 Arti
ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.06.19 10:31:43 +05'30'