-1- 2025:CGHC:41819 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5152 of 2017 Raghuram Yadav S/o Shri Damu Ram Yadav, Aged About 40 Years Occupation Part Time Sweeper, In The Office Of District Employment Exchange, Raigarh, R/o Ashok Vihar Colony, Dhemrapur, Police Station City Kotwali, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Labour Welfare, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The District Employment Officer, District Raigah Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Pramod Jain, S/o Late Sri Tarachand Jain, Aged About 47 Years Posted As District Employment Officer, R/o G - 12, Officers Colony, Panjari Plant, In Front Of Income Tax Office, Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19.08.2025 1) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions and the respondents may kindly be directed to produce complete records. Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 2] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to perform his duties in District Employment Exchange, Raigarh. 3] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction to the respondents to make regular payment to the petitioner. 4] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper.” 2) The petitioner was a daily rated employee working under the respondents and his services were discontinued by an oral order. 3) It is contended by Mr. Payashi, learned counsel for the petitioner that wages were not paid to the petitioner for the services rendered by him for the period from January, 2017 to 31.05.2017. 4) On the other hand, Ms. Shukla, would submit that a cheque of Rs 15,344/- was issued in favour of the petitioner on 31.01.2018 through speed post. She would further submit that as the petitioner was a daily rated employee, he has no right to claim for regularization etc. She would also submit that petitioner has already been employed as salesman in the Chhattisgarh Marketing Corporation Limited. 5) Considering the submission made by Ms. Shukla, I do not find any good ground to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is hereby dismissed at the admission stage itself. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim -3-