Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7528 WP No. 13390 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 13390 OF 2017 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
SRI. N. VISHWANATHAN, AGED 74 YEARS, SON N.P.R. NALGAMU CHETTIAR, R/AT SUNNY BROOKS, SARJAPUR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 035. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE - 560 002.
2.
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MARATHAHALLI RANGE, MAHADEVAPURA ZONE, BANGALORE - 560 048. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H. DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FORM- B PROPERTY REGISTER EXTRACT DATED 21.07.2016 BEARING SL.NO.A-15-37067 AT ANNEX-C ISSUED BY R-2 AND ETC., Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7528 WP No. 13390 of 2017
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is challenging the issuance of an extract of the Property Register in respect to his property which is titled as Form-B Property Register Extract.
2. The petitioner contends that, there is no provision to have two separate registers and the statutory requires only one register to be followed.
3. It may be pertinent to state here that, during the pendency of this petition, the BBMP Act has been enacted which provides for two registers to be maintained. One for lawful land and buildings and the other for unlawful land and buildings. It is therefore clear that, the statute as it stands now permits the creation of two registers which
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7528 WP No. 13390 of 2017 would fundamentally indicate the legality of the structures or the sites that are been formed.
4. In the light of the above, the prayer sought for in this writ petition by the petitioners cannot be considered and the same is therefore rejected. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35 CT: BHK