VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/4345/2025 · 2025-05-12
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27669-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4345 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vipin Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, has submitted that no part of Gata No.809 measuring 1.680 hectares situated at Village Raghunathpur Hariharpur, Tehsil Mishrikh, District Sitapur belonging to the petitioner is encroached upon by the State for the purpose of construction of chak road. It is rather pointed out that the petitioner is in possession of some part of Gata No.834 upon which the chak road is proposed to be constructed. The encroachment by the petitioner himself upon Gata No.834 is without any authority of law for which necessary proceedings required, if any, shall be taken up and the occupation removed.
3. Once the land belong to the petitioner i.e. Gata No.809 is not interfered with by the State authorities in any manner, we do not find that there is any violation in the rights of the petitioner upon his land. The writ petition being misconceived is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.) Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Shubhankar Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench