Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138521 (ALL)

NAMRATA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. POLLUTION, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/4950/2025 · 2025-05-06

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26087 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4950 of 2025 Petitioner :- Namrata Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Pollution, Forest And Climate Change Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Kumar Yadav,Amit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondents. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation raising his grievances to respondent no. 1, with a direction to decide the same within a stipulated period. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Considering the above, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation before respondent no. 1 within two weeks from today and in case, such a representation is submitted, the same shall be decided by respondent no. 1 within a further period of four weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench