Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13852 (JHR)

SAMIR ALIAS TAIMUDDIN ANSARI ALIAS MD. SAMIR ANSARI ALIAS SAMIR ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4092/2025 · 2025-07-25

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025: JHHC:20494 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4092 of 2025 Samir @ Taimuddin Asari @ Md. Samir Ansari @ Samir Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Late Imadat Ansari, resident of village Bhognadih, P.O and P.S. Bhognadih, District Sahibganj --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. --- 03 / 25.07.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 153 of 2024 arising out of Barhait P.S. Case No. 122 of 2023 for the offence registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Sahibganj. 3. Bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this court vide B.A. No. 2762 of 2024 by order dated 02.05.2024. 4. On 20.10.2023 at 12.30 noon, petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the son of the Informant by lathi, due to which, he succumbed to his injuries. 5. Report regarding the stage of the trial earlier called for, has been received. It appears that all the witnesses have been examined in this case and the trial is likely to be concluded within three to four months. 6. Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner has examined one witness. 7. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. Learned Trial Court shall expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within six months from the next date fixed for recording of the evidence. (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded