Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13852 (HP)

DEVI SARAN v. THE HRTC AND ANOTHER

CWP/7667/2025 · 2025-05-16

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7667 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Devi Saran …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K.Vashisht, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Notice. Mr. Dheeraj K.Vashisht, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. The instant petition has been filed, praying for a direction to the respondents to release enhanced dearness relief and interim relief with arrears along with interest in favour for the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to office memorandum dated 07.02.2015 (Annexure P-1), whereunder dearness relief to Himachal Pradesh Government Pensioner/Family Pensioners was revised w.e.f. 01.07.2014. Reliance was also placed upon office memorandum dated 07.03.2020, issued by the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Department of Finance Government of Himachal Pradesh, further revising the dearness relief of Himachal Pradesh Government Pensioners/ Family Pensioners w.e.f. 01.07.2019. 5. It is not in dispute that office memorandums dated 07.02.2015 and 07.03.2020 have been adopted by the respondent/Corporation and dearness relief in terms of these office memorandums is admissible to the petitioner, but the same has not been released to him. 6. Consequently, in view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to pay due and admissible dearness relief to the petitioner in terms of above office memorandums within a period of six weeks from today. It is, however, made clear that in case due and admissible dearness relief is not paid by the respondents to the petitioner within the aforesaid period, then the same shall carry interest @ 5% per annum from the due date till its realization. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 16, 2025 (Sunil)