Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138515 (ALL)

SADASHIV AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/2800/2025 · 2025-05-12

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27621 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2800 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sadashiv And Another Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "a. Direct the opposite party no.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No.77/2008-09, Computerized Case No. C-2009040000105, Jiyalal and others V/s Uday Raj and others, under section 210 of L.R. Act, relating to Village-Harraiya, Pargana-Bidhar, Tehsil- Tanda, District-Ambedkar Nagar expeditiously within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the appeal is pending since 2009 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioners, as stated, who are senior citizens, are suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Appeal No.77/2008- 09, Computerized Case No. C-2009040000105 (Jiyalal and others V/s Uday Raj and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench