Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138511 (MAD)

Murugesan v. The District Revenue Officer

WP(MD)/13720/2025 · 2025-06-02

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD) No.13720 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.(MD) No.13720 of 2025 Murugesan ... Petitioner Vs 1 The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Karur, Karur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kulithalai, Karur District. 3 The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Kulithalai, Karur District. 4 Nallusamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to cancel the Pattas bearing Patta Nos.3545 and 962, obtained by the 4th ____________ p. 2 W.P.(MD) No.13720 of 2025 Respondent during UDR scheme in a fraudulent manner and issue patta to all the legal heirs of petitioner's mother-in-law Karuppayi Ammal, W/o.Palaniyandi Gounder, for her properties comprised in Survey No.489/7 and 489/9, situated at Putthur Revenue Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.M.Gangadharan, Govt. Advocate. ORDER The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the first respondent to cancel the patta issued in favour of the fourth respondent in respect of the property comprised in Survey Nos.489/7 and 489/9, situate in Putthur Revenue Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District. 2. According to the petitioner, the above mentioned property originally belonged to the petitioner's mother-in-law – Karuppayi Ammal, wife of Palaniyandi. After her death, the fourth respondent, who is the son of the deceased Karuppayi Ammal, by suppressing the existence of other legal heirs, obtained patta in his name exclusively . Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation before the second respondent on 15.04.2025, seeking cancellation of patta issued in favour of the fourth respondent and issuance of ____________ p. 3 W.P.(MD) No.13720 of 2025 joint patta in the names of all legal heirs of the deceased Karuppayi Ammal. The said representation has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner has come forward before this Court by way of this Writ Petition. 3. Mr.M.Gangadharan, Govt. Advocate, takes notice for respondents 1 to 3, and submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner, dated 15.04.2025, will be considered on its own merits within a time stipulated by this Court. 4. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.04.2025, on its own merits and pass final orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and also the fourth respondent. 5. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 02.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No dixit ____________ p. 4 W.P.(MD) No.13720 of 2025 To: 1 The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Karur, Karur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kulithalai, Karur District. 3 The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Kulithalai, Karur District. ____________ p. 5 W.P.(MD) No.13720 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. dixit W.P.(MD) No.13720 of 2025 02.06.2025 ____________