SATYA NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/4364/2025 · 2025-05-12
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138508 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138508 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27693-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4364 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. The petitioner is permitted to delete the name of opposite party no.6 from the array of parties.
Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the opposite parties no.2 to 5 are not disturbing the possession of the petitioner over Gata No. 365 min jumla measuring 0.3160 hectares to the extent of his share i.e.0.1200 hectares upon which the house is said to have been constructed.
Learned counsel for the State has rather stated that some part of gata no.365 min jumla is recorded as barren land which is vested in the gaon sabha. We leave it open for the gaon sabha to initiate demarcation proceedings with respect to Gata No. 365 min jumla which is recorded as barren. In case the petitioner is found in possession over more than the area recorded in his name or he has encroached upon any part of the barren land, necessary proceedings may accordingly be carried out after taking up the demarcation proceedings by the state authorities accordingly. The writ petition with the aforesaid clarification is
disposed of. (Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. ) (Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.)
Order Date :- 12.5.2025/Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench