SANJEET KUMAR ALIAS SANJEET GIRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5109/2025 · 2025-06-25
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13847 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13847 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:16946 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5109 of 2025
------ Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Giri, aged about 26 years, son of Kishori Das, resident of Village-Chakchuko, P.O. & P.S.- Vishnugarh, Dist.-Hazaribag, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 25.06.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.142 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 308(iv) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the informant received ransom call twice from one Vikram Jee of TSPC and the supervisor of his crusher also received threatening call. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of his confession made in Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.02.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi, in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.142 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/