Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13846 (BOM)

THE ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCO, AURANGABAD v. RUKMINIBAI KACHRU SALVE (DIED) THRO. LRS. SANDU (DIED) THR. LRS SUREKHA SANDU SALVE AND ORS

CA/3527/2025 · 2025-03-28

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 930.(ii)CA.-3527-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3527 OF 2025 IN FA/1537/2014 THE ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCO, AURANGABAD VERSUS RUKMINIBAI KACHRU SALVE (DIED) THRO. LRS. SANDU (DIED) THR. LRS SUREKHA SANDU SALVE AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.V. Deshmukh AGP for Respondent No.6 : Mr. S.M. Ganachari Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 : Mr. N.T. Tribhuvan … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 28th MARCH 2025 PER COURT : 1. This application is for bringing heirs of deceased Respondent No.4 – Ashok Kachru Salve on record. There is delay of 2275 days in preferring this application for bringing heirs on record. The cause of action survives against the heirs. The First Appeal is yet to be decided finally. 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, I am inclined to allow the same. 3. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’. 4. Amendment to be carried out by the Applicant within two weeks. SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB.. 2025:BHC-AUG:9995