Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13845 (GAU)

KAVERI BORO v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/1843/2025 · 2025-09-25

Nelson Sailo

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010049122023 2025:GAU-AS:13368 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1843/2025 KAVERI BORO DAUGHTER OF PRADIP KUMAR BORO PERMANENT ADDRESS- VILL 1 NO. DAKUAPARA P.O AND P.S- BOKO DISTT KAMRUP (R) PIN CODE781123. 2: SRI UTPAL KALITA S/O LATE BANESHWAR KALITA R/O- SWAHIDNAGAR P.S-NOONMATI GUWAHATI DISTT- KAMRUP (M) PIN781020 3: MONJUR HASSAN BARBHHUIYA S/O- ISLAM UDDIN BARHUIYA R/O-MAZIRGRAM SONAI P.O- SONAIMUKH DISTT- CACHAR PIN788119. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION DISPUR GUWAHATI - 781006 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM HIGHER EDUCATION (TECHNICAL) DEPARTMENT Page No.# 2/3 GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI -781019 4:THE COMMISSIONER FINANCE (ECIII) DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 5:THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (APSC) KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN OR SECRETARY. 6:THE ASSAM ENGINEERING RECRUITMENT SERVICE BOARD ASSAM TEXTILE INSTITUTE CAMPUS AMBARI GUWAHATI REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN ------------ Advocate for : MR H K NATH Advocate for : SC HIGHER EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 26-09-2025 Heard Ms. G Goswami, learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners, who submits that by filing this interlocutory application, the applicants, who are the petitioner Nos. 2, 9 and 12 in the connected writ petition prays for their withdrawal from the writ petition since they had participated in the recruitment process initiated, vide advertisement dated 30.12.2024 for the Page No.# 3/3 post of Lecturers (technical) in Government Polytechnic Colleges of Assam. That since they have performed well and they have been called for the viva- voce and eventually selected, they will not like to press the writ petition and prays for their withdrawal from the case. The learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to the prayer made. In view of above, the applicants, who are arrayed as petitioner Nos. 2, 9 and 12 in the connected writ petition, i.e., WP(C) 1264/2023 are allowed to withdraw themselves from the said writ petition. The interlocutory application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant