COCP No.1116 of 202 IN TH 226-U VIDYA DEVI Vs SH. SATYENDR CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. for th Mr. R HARKESH MAN 1. Upon respondents and by the Hon’ble D CM Nos.1634-LP 2. In vi the present petiti petition, subject to 3. Dism 4. Rule March 05, 2025 Atik Whe Whe 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De NDRA DUHAN, HCS AND OTHER ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, D.A.G., Hary **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Upon advance notice, learned State s and informs that the order passed by Division Bench of this Court vide LPA, 1633-LPA & 1635-LPA of 2 In view of the above, learned counse petition at this stage, however, see bject to final outcome of the aforement Dismissed as not pressed with the afo Rule stands discharged. (HA 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.1116 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 05.03.2025 ......Petitioner THERS....Respondents ESH MANUJA ., Haryana. State counsel appears on behalf of th ssed by the Writ Court has been staye vide order dated 03.03.2025 passed of 2025 in LPA No.623 of 2025. counsel for the petitioner does not pre er, seeks liberty to revive the prese rementioned LPA. the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 lf of the n stayed assed in ot press present MOHMED ATIK 2025.03.06 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment