Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26247 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4955 of 2025 Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Singh And 4 Others Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. General Manager And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sweta Swarankar,Ashok Kumar Chaubey,Hari Krishna Srivastava,Nishant Singh,Surendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Kapish Srivastava Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Surendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.S. Rajawat, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of all the opposite parties. Said Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the opposite parties to pass an order for renewal of services of the petitioners on the post of Business Facilitators for the year of 2024-2025 and also for further next years as per Circular No. DBOD-NO. BLBC- 58/22.01.001/2005-06 dated-25.01.2006 of R.B.I. (contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition). ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to take Regular work and also pay regular remuneration each and every month to the petitioners as per "Instruction Circular No. 7748" dated-27th August 2007 of Union Bank of India. iii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to pay the arrears of remuneration to the petitioners, which has not been paid to them from the year of 2023 till date." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the petitioners have been assigned the job of business facilitator in the Bank in question since long time and they are still discharging their duties on such position but some of the petitioners are not being paid their remuneration for couple of months and the petitioners may likely be discontinued without any cogent reasons. He has further submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioners have preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to prefer fresh separate representation before opposite party no.2 and this Court may direct opposite party no.2 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioners are permitted to prefer fresh separate representation to opposite party no.2 i.e. Regional Manager, Regional Office, 1st Floor, Union Bank Bhavan, Vibhuti Khand, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representations and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representations are preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representations of the petitioners by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the representations and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioners forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 6.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench