MD TOUSEEF ALAM ALIAS TOSIEEF ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./1450/2023 · 2025-02-12
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13834 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13834 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1450 of 2023 --------- Md. Touseef Alam @ Tosieef Alam, aged about 21 years, son of Md. Giyaas, Resident of Village-Noor Nagar Neamatpur, P.O. & P.S.-Asansol, District-Paschim Bardhawan (West Bengal)
… … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Shama Parween (informant and Mother of the victim Rshma Parween), aged about 40 years, wife of-Tasleem Ansari, Resident of Village-Sett Villa Sapaha, P.O. & P.S.-Madhupur, District-Deoghar, (Jharkhand)
3. Reshma Parween, aged about 16 years, Daughter of-Tasleem Ansari, Resident of Village-Sett Villa Sapaha, P.O. & P.S-Madhupur, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand)
…. …. Opposite Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kr. Verma, Advocate
Ms. Rajni Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, A.P.P. ----------- 05/Dated: 12th February, 2025
1. Since, the matter has been listed under the heading for orders (with defect) for removal of the surviving defect(s) as pointed out by the stamp reporter.
2. From perusal of the record, the surviving defect(s) appears to be minor in nature, hence, the said defect(s) is ignored.
3. However, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Pappu/-