Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13833 (AP)

M. Sudharasana Reddy v. Sri Seshi Bhushan Kumar

CC/2077/2024 · 2025-09-22

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010168652024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2077/2024 Between: 1. M. SUDHARASANA REDDY, S/O M.MALLIKARJUNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O K.RAMI REDDY VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SESHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, THE STATE OF A.P. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI GUNTURU DISTRICT. 2. SRI SHAMER SIGH RAWAT LAS, THE STATE OF A.P. REP ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI GUNTURU DISTRICT 3. SRI NARAYANA REDDY, THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT 4. SRI KAMATHAM SRINIVSULU, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. SRI BORRA BALA CHANDRA REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I. DIVISION,KADAPA,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. SRI M CHANDRA SEKHAR, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION MI SUB DIVISION, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of courts Act 1971 for violation and willful disobedience of the Order passed in W.P.No.27669 of 2023, dated 20.11.2023 passed by his (LORDSHIP JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA) and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the respondents 7 to 11 as party respondents 7 to 11 in CC.No.2077 of 2024 in W.P.No. 27669 of 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B S VENKATA RAMESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2077/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 20.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.27669 of 2023. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 20.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.27669 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23.09.2025 TTPPSS 4 10 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2077/2024 23.09.2025 TTPPSS