Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138312 (MAD)

Gandhi v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

CRL OP(MD)/8154/2025 · 2025-04-30

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.OP(MD) No.8154 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.8154 of 2025 1. Gandhi 2. Sankar 3. Marimuthu 4. Ramachandran 5. Jeyalakshmi ..Petitioners .vs. 1. The Inspector of Police Chatrakudi Police Station Ramanathapuram District 2. Santhakumar ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records in STC No.2495 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramakudi and quash the same as against the petitioners. For petitioners : Mr.G.Mohandoss For Respondents : Mr. M.Vaikkam Karunanithi No.1 Government Advocate (Crl side) No.2 : Mr.K.Muthuvai Ilayaraja _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) No.8154 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings pending in STC No.2495 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramakudi 2. Based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Crime No.101 of 2019 for the offences under Sections 147,294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsels on both sides represented that during pendency of the case, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court. 4. Today, the defacto-complainant and the accused are present and the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto- complainant represented that they entered into a compromise. A compromise memo, dated 25.04.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsels, is also filed before this Court. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) No.8154 of 2025 5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo. 6. Considering the nature of the offences, the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition. 7. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and STC No.2495 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramakudi is quashed. The compromise memo dated 25.04.2025 filed by the parties shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 30.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) No.8154 of 2025 To 1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramakudi 2. The Inspector of Police Chatrakudi Police Station Ramanathapuram District 3 .The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) No.8154 of 2025 P.DHANABAL,J. aav Crl.OP(MD) No.8154 of 2025 30.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis