Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13831 (UTT)

SHAHRUKH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/2566/2024 · 2025-01-10

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2566 of 2024 Shahrukh …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.1233 of 2023, dated 21.12.2023, under Sections 107, 342, 366-A, 368, 376(3), 506, 201, 120-B IPC and Sections 3(a)/4, 13/14, 16/17, 19/21 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sections 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 67-B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 Police Station Manglore, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail by this Court. 4. Learned State counsel admits this fact. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 10.01.2025 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd50 4686df4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8 EC450A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699 , cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.01.10 17:08:49 +05'30'