Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010123112025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3398/2025 ALIM UDDIN S/O MOINUL HOQUE, P/R/O VILL- MADHYAM SAMARALI, P.O.- CHOUDHURY BAZAR, P.S.- MURAJHAR, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GRIHA MANTRALAYA, NEW DELHI 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI-110001 4:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZEN ASSAM BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-781005 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KARBI ANGLONG DIST- KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) KARBI ANGLONG P.O. KARBI ANGLONG DIST- KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PI Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. I HUSSAIN, MS. M MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, NRC,SC, ECI,SC, F.T,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SEMA ORDER Date : 25.06.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned CGC, Mr. H. Kuli, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. I. Ali SC, ECI, Mr. J. Payang, learned Standing Counsel for the FT Matters and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State. 2. Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, has submitted that in the meanwhile the procedee in the FT Case No.123 /2007, which was decided opinion dated 8.11.2023, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal Diphu Karbi Anglong in F.T. Case No. 123/2023 arising out of S.P.(B) Reference Case No. 12/2007, has assailed the said opinion. 3. In this matter, by order dated 18.06.2025, the Court had already granted to the petitioner, the visitation right to meet his son, namely, Md. Mainul Haque, and to obtain his signature in the vakalatnama. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the said order has been complied with. Page No.# 3/3 4. Accordingly, the Court finds no purpose to keep this matter alive in view of the challenge already made by the procedee, against an ex parte opinion referred above. 5. Accordingly, The writ petition stands closed without prejudice to Md. Mainul Haque the concerned proceedee to assail the opinion referred above. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant