Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138259 (ALL)

DHIREANDRA PRATAP PAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/3773/2025 · 2025-05-09

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27289 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3773 of 2025 Applicant :- Dhireandra Pratap Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. has been preferred with the following prayer:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash entire proceeding of Case No. 4471 of 2022 (State vs. Dhirendra Pratap Pal) arising out of FIR No. 0082 of 2021 U/S 409, 420, 467, 468 IPC, Police Station- P.G.I., Lucknow pending before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow and charge sheet no. 01 of 2021 dated 11/12/2021 under section 409, 420, 467, 468 submitted by the investigating officer in the aforesaid case crime number as well as Summoning order dated 04.02.2022 passed by Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow." After arguing the matter at some length, Sri Suresh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC Online SC 116, and also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may also be directed to be decided expeditiously. Learned A.G.A has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the court concerned, prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below, if charges have not already been framed, and the same shall be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law, if there is no any other legal impediment. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench