- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13592 RSA No. 127 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI PRAKASH N S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGEDA BOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.215, NAGANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK - 571114. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GIRIDHAR S V, GIRIDHAR AND CO.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT LOLAKSHAMMA WIFE OF NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.287, NELAMANE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTICT - 571435. 2. SMT.MANGALA W/O K.MUTTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEAS RESIDING AT NO.48, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS, B.M. SRINAGAR, MYSORE. 3. SMT.VANAJAKSHI WIFE OF VIJENDRA Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13592 RSA No. 127 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.40, 3RD CROSS, B.M. SRINAGAR, MYSORE - 570020. 4. SMT.PREMAKUMARI.N WIFE OF LATE GOVINDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.361, B.M.SRI NAGAR, MYSORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVANNA K .M. AND SRI.H.S.MAHADEVA SWAMY ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1, R2 AND R3) (SRI.L.G.HARISH ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.10.2021 PASSED IN RA.No.376/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.10.2020 PASSED IN OS No.112/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13592 RSA No. 127 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the appellant and respondents have settled the dispute and differences among themselves in the FDP.NO.54/2020 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mysuru by filing the Compromise Petition. The said compromise petition has not been accepted by the Court below because of the interim order in the instant appeal. 2. In view of filing of the compromise petition in the Final Decree Proceedings, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal, with a direction to the trial Court to accept the compromise petition. 3. Memo is placed on record. 4. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The FDP Court is directed to accept the Compromise Petition in accordance with law. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RCK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23