M/s Maa Shailputri, Prop. Lakshmi Shankar, thru. Authorized Signatory Aniruddh Baranwal v. State of U.P. thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. Environment Forest and Climate Change and 4 Others
WRIC/4224/2025 · 2025-05-15
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138225 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138225 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28467-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4224 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Maa Shailputri, Prop. Lakshmi Shankar, Thru. Authorized Signatory Aniruddh Baranwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. Environment Forest And Climate Change And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Verma Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri A. K. Verma, the learned counsel for the U.P. Pollution Control Board. 2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of orders dated 19.02.2024 passed by opposite party no.5/ Chief Environmental Office (Circle-2), U.P. Pollution Control Board TC-12V, Vibhuti Khand Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226010. 3. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being finally decided at the admission stage. 4. It is true that some proceedings for carrying out mining without issuance of a C.T.O. by U.P. Pollution Control Board had been initiated against the petitioner before the National Green Tribunal i.e. N.G.T. and the matter was set at rest by order dated 13.08.2024, a copy of which has been placed before us. 5. It is informed that the petitioner has taken up his cause in so far as the quantification of compensation to the tune of Rs.20,30,000/- is concerned. The objections filed by the petitioner are under consideration. 6. The present order of closure passed on 19.02.2024 proceeds on the strength of an inspection report dated 08/09.02.2024 of which a show cause notice is stated to have been issued to the petitioner on 12.01.2024. The show cause notice dated 12.01.2024 mentions the inspection dates as 28.12.2023 to 30.12.2023. 7. We do not gather any reflection of such inspection reports to have surfaced in the previous proceedings decided by N.G.T. by order dated
13.08.2024. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the show cause notice dated 12.01.2024 does not set out any violation whatsoever as may have been specifically postulated under the C.T.O. issued in favour of the petitioner on 12.12.2023. It is further submitted that the petitioner is carrying out the business of mining after the issuance of C.T.O. dated 12.12.2023 strictly in accordance with law. 9.
It is submitted that unless the violation of C.T.O. or any condition of the lease is specifically mentioned in the show cause notice regarding which a reply sought from him after furnishing necessary material, an order of closure passed against the petitioner is clearly in the teeth of principles of natural justice. 10. Shri A.K. Verma, the learned counsel for the U.P. Pollution control Board on the contrary has not been able to justify as to how the impugned order dated 19.02.2024 is sustainable when the inspection reports relied upon the show cause notice as well as in the impugned order were neither supplied to the petitioner nor a specific violation of C.T.O. was mentioned therein. 11. In these circumstances, the submissions put forth before us by the learned counsel for the petitioner have force and the order of closure requires interference in the interest of justice. 12. At this stage, the learned counsel for the U.P. Pollution Control Board has submitted that the Board may be granted a liberty to proceed against
the petitioner afresh, in accordance with law, by issuing a fresh notice containing appropriate details/accompanied by the relevant material. 13. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the orders dated 19.02.2024, as contained in Annexure Nos.1 & 2 to the writ petition, are hereby quashed. 14. However, it will be open for the authorities to institute fresh proceedings against the petitioner in accordance with law by issuing a fresh show cause notice, keeping in view the observations made in this order. (Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J) (Attau Rahman Masoodi, J) Order Date :- 15.5.2025 A.Dewal Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench