Crl.O.P(MD)No.8041 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.8041 of 2025 K.Rajesh ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 3. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, the Inspector of Police, Kalayarkovil Police Station, Kalayarkovil, Sivagangai District. 4. Vairamani The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkovil Police Station, Sivagangai District. 5. Nagaraj, The Superintendent of Police (Special Team), Sivagangai District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.8041 of 2025 6. Saravanakumar, The Superintendent of Police (Special Team), Sivagangai District. 7. Kaleeswaran, The Superintendent of Police (Special Team), Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the respondents No.2 to 7 not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh, For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 2 to 7 not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry. 2.According to the petitioner, the respondent police are harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. Hence this petition. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.8041 of 2025 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner is a history sheet rowdy and he has six previous cases in his credit. Therefore, they have watched the movements of the petitioner and apart from that they have not harassed the petitioner as alleged in this petition. 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondent, is inclined to pass order. 5.Since the prayer of the petitioner is not to harass the petitioner and the second respondent also denied the alleged harassment and only they have watched the movements of the petitioner and apart from that they have not harassed the petitioner as alleged in this petition, recording the same, this criminal original petition is closed. 30.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.8041 of 2025 To 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 3. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, the Inspector of Police, Kalayarkovil Police Station, Kalayarkovil, Sivagangai District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.8041 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. LR Crl.O.P(MD)No.8041 of 2025 30.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis