SANJAY SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/4333/2025 · 2025-05-12
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138209 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138209 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27686-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4333 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarjoo Ram,Aklavya,Chandan Prasad,Manish Kumar Shrivastav,Prashant Shekhar,Ravi Kant Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to substantiate the right to compensation as claimed in the present writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, has also denied the existence of any such scheme under which such compensation would be admissible to the petitioner. That being the position, the writ petition, being wholly misconceived, is rejected. (A. K. Srivastava-I,J.) (A. R. Masoodi,J.)
Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Mahesh Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench