Mahesh Kumar Gajpal v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.
WPS/5615/2014 · 2025-03-19
Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13820 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13820 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (WPS No. 5615 of 2014)
2025:CGHC:13084
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5615 of 2014 1 - Mahesh Kumar Gajpal S/o Bhikham Lal Gajpal Aged About 38 Years R/o Village And Post Sanna, Ps Sanna, Tah Bagicha, Distt Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Dist Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Additional Collector Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tilakdhari Yadav S/o Shriram Yadav R/o Sarudih, Post Komdo, Jashpur, Posted As Vehicle Driver, District Hospital, Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shivnarayan Ram S/o Bhagwati Ram R/o Village Darakharika Jatakona, Post Narayanpur, Tah Kunkuri, Distt Jashpur, Posted As Vehicle Driver, Community Health Centre, Duldula, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Anil Kumar Bada S/o Tusa Bada R/o Post Pakargaon, Tah Patthalgaon, Distt Jashpur, Posted As Vehicle Driver, Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.03.21 11:14:37 +0530
2 (WPS No. 5615 of 2014) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Ms. Deeksha Bharati Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State :- Mr. Pankaj Singh, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
19.03.2025
1. Heard on IA No.02, which is an application for withdrawal of the instant writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue the instant writ petition and, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.
3. Accordingly, IA No.02 is allowed, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!