Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13819 (AP)

P.RAM MOHAN RAO v. P.LAKSHMI NARASAMAMBA

FCA/81/2008 · 2025-04-23

Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010168512008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI FAMILY COURT APPEAL N Between: 1. P.Ram Mohan Rao 224, H.B. Colony, Visakhapatnam AND 1. P Lakshmi Narasamamba S.V.Appa Rao, H.No.21 District. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following The learned counsel for the appellant efforts and sending a registered letter, he could not secure instructions from the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.81 of 2008 Ram Mohan Rao, S/o.P.Ramana Rao, Employee, R/o.D. Visakhapatnam. ...Appellant Lakshmi Narasamamba, W/o.P.Ram Mohan Rao C/o.late Rao, H.No.21-5-24, Salipeta, Kakinada, East Godavari ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per NJS,J) The learned counsel for the appellant states that despite his best efforts and sending a registered letter, he could not secure instructions from the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in [3526] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO .D.No.18- Appellant , W/o.P.Ram Mohan Rao C/o.late 24, Salipeta, Kakinada, East Godavari Respondent states that despite his best efforts and sending a registered letter, he could not secure instructions from the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in 2 2. Hence, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J ____________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J April 23, 2025 vasu