Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13818 (UTT)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3664/2024 · 2025-01-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:450 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 3664 of 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Bhupendra Prasad, Mr. Deepak Kumar Pal and Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, learned counsels for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1 to 3. 3. Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 4. Petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 11.11.2024 passed by Additional Commissioner, Garhwal in Appeal No. 79 of 2023-24. 5. Learned counsel for respondents submits that the judgment impugned by petitioner is appealable under Section 331(4) of Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. 6. This submission is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. Since, petitioner has remedy of second appeal against the impugned judgment, therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.) 10.01.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a1 31bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56 D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.01.10 18:36:58 +05'30'