Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138177 (ALL)

ANTIMA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/7529/2025 · 2025-09-08

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7529 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 4. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party nos. 5 to 11 is dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the following prayers:- "(1) Issue Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus for commanding and directing to the opposite parties no. 2, 3 and 4 for conducting fair, proper and just investigation of Case Crime No. 0544/2024 registered on 27.10.2024 under section 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 64, 89 of B.N.S., 2023 and 3/4 D.P. Act at Police Station Maholi, District Sitapur, in the interest of justice. (ii) It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 2 to conduct the investigation of FIR No. 0544/2024 registered on 27.10.2024 under section 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 64, 89 of B.N.S., 2023 and 3/4 D.P. Act at Police Station - Maholi, District - Sitapur from any other police station of the district Hardoi in the interest of justice." 4. Sri Tilhari, learned A.G.A. has informed that the investigation is going on properly and the statement of the prosecutrix under Section 180 & 183 BNSS has been recorded. He has also informed that the investigation is transferred to Crime Branch. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Antima Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, since the investigation is going on, so it is expected that such investigation would be concluded with expedition, in as much as, about ten months of period have passed after lodging the FIR. 6. In view of the aforesaid fact, this writ petition is disposed of finally having expectation that the investigation would be conducted and concluded strictly in accordance with law with expedition. If the petitioner is aggrieved from unnecessary delay in concluding the investigation, she may approach the competent authority/Court of law. September 8, 2025 Arun CRLP No. 7529 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench