State of H.P vs. Ravinder Kumar @ Romi Cr. MP(M) No. 1323 of 2024 13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the petitioner/State. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent. It appears from Para 15 of the judgment of learned Appellate Court that learned Appellate Court has relied upon the supplementary statement recorded during the investigation and record its findings, which, prima facie, is not permissible; hence, There are reasons to grant leave to appeal in the present case. In these circumstances, leave to appeal is granted. The present application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal No. ____ of 2025 Be registered. Record be requisitioned and the matter be listed thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge March 13th, 2025 (saurav pathania)