Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25851 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4920 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Veena Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party Nos.1, 2, 3 & 5 and Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party No.6. 2. In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the concerned opposite parties that they consider the case of the petitioner and ensure the joining of the petitioner against the post of Rojgar Sewak and further the concerned opposite parties also permit the petitioner to work as Rojgar Sewak and pay the honorarium without any further delay, in the interest of justice." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred various representations to the authority concerned, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has stated that she has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 7. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench