1 2025:CGHC:9435 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1145 of 2017 Rajendra Kumar Soni S/o Late Ram Bagas Soni, Aged About 49 Years Occupation Posted As Sub Engineer In The O/o Executive Engineer, Tandula Water Resources Division Durg, R/o 52- C Priyadarshania Nagar, Risali, Bhilai, P S Newai, District Durg Chhattisgarh, ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Govt Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - General Administration Department Through The Secretary Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 3 - Panchayat And Rural Development Department Through Additional Chief Secretary Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 4 - Public Works Department Through The Principal Secretary Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 5 - Water Resources Department Through The Secretary, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 6 - Housing And Environment Department Through The Secretary Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, SUNITA GOSWAMI Digitally signed by SUNITA GOSWAMI Date: 2025.02.24 17:10:33 +0530 2 7 - Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment Department, Through The Commissioner- Cum- Secretary, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 8 - Public Health Engneering Department (P H E D) Through The Secretary Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 9 - Urban Administration And Development Department Through Special Secretary Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 10 - The Institution Of Civil Engineers (India) Through Secretary General “Career House”, Bindra Complex Model Town, Ludhiana (Punjab), 11 - All India Council For Technical Education, Through- Chairman, Nelson Mandela Marg, Near Vasant Kunj, PS- Vasant Kunj, Opposite Ambience Mall, Delhi-110070, ---- Respondents _____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :None For State/Respondents No. 1 to 9 :Shri Sachhidanand Yadav, P.L. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal Order On Board 24.02.2025 1. No one appeared earlier on 26.11.2024 and today also none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the Petitioner when the case is called out for hearing. 2. In the above circumstances, this Court has no other option, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE sunita