HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2474 of 2023 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Sri S. M Singh Royekwar assisted by Sri Sumeet Tahilramani the counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel as well as Ms. Akshita Yadav holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra who appears for the respondents no. 7 & 8. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 24.07.2017 passed in Regular Suit No.840 of 2010. 3. Considering the fact that an appeal is prescribed against the decree passed in a suit, no interference is called for under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. The writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner would be at liberty to file an appeal, if so advised in accordance with law. In case, the appeal is filed, the time spent by the petitioner before this Court shall also be considered while condoning the delay. 5. Needless to add that the appeal filed shall be decided on its own merits. September 18, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S M Singh Royekwar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Kumar Tripathi, Anurakt Singh, Namit Sharma, Ratnesh Chandra, Yogesh Tiwari (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Hazratganj Delegacy Recreation Club Lko. University Thru. Its Vice Chairman .....Petitioner(s) Byomkesh Prasad Singh And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench