Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138100 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/446/2025 · 2025-05-15

Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28487-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 446 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Rawat Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shilpi Singh Bhadauriya,Mamta Tripathi,Neeam Verma,Om Prakash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. The subject matter of the instant writ petition is already sub- judice in the proceedings under section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner has failed to disclose such a fact in the present writ petition filed in the shape of public interest. Once the matter is sub judice in the judicial proceedings before the competent revenue court, we do not find it a fit case for being entertained in the public interest litigation at the instance of the petitioner, who has not undertaken complete exercise of finding out the relevant facts. The writ petition in view of the proceedings being pending before the competent court is not maintainable and the instant PIL is accordingly rejected. . [Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.][Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 15.5.2025 akhilesh/- Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench